Item 6 from Provost Jordan's email update to university
faculty.
This update was distributed via
faculty@list.gcsu.edu on 18 Jan 2011 at 12:06 PM
6. Update on
Participation Rates on the Student Opinion of Teaching Surveys:
As you know there is great concern over the falling participation rates
on the Student Opinion of Teaching surveys. Over the summer and most
recent semester we have been gathering information on the issue,
speaking to sister institutions that have successfully addressed the
problem, identifying best practices, and working with our SGA and FAPC
to identify strategies to improve the student response rate.
Brief History: Before
Spring 2009 surveys were printed and professors stopped class during a
designated time period to distribute the surveys. The participation rate
was relatively high…with a percentage ranging between the mid 75 and
82%. The transition from paper to an online version was made on campus
during fall 2009 with one unwelcomed result: a drop in participation
rate. The online version has be administered over the past three
semesters and the participation rates among students asked to take the
survey the last several semesters have ranged from 33 to 60%. While the
online version of the Student Opinion surveys has improved the process
in a number of important ways- including: decreasing the impact on
staff workloads, increasing flexibility as to when to complete the
survey, increasing the consistency of the messaging and survey
protocol, reducing the need to interrupt teaching time, allowing
participation by students enrolled in online classes, and reducing
costs- the significant drop in participation must be addressed.
Findings: Almost all
institutions that migrated to online surveys experienced a temporary
drop in participation that improves steadily over time. But, those
institutions that implemented incentives for completing the survey and
took deliberate steps to enhance messaging and build a culture of
accountability were able to increase participation more significantly
and speedily.
Plans: The strategy we
have developed has several parts. I will outline those parts here and
respond to specific questions when I visit the colleges this semester.
Students will be sent several notices about completing the survey. If
they do not complete the survey over a set period of time, they will be
asked to complete a short survey that asks them to respond to questions
about why they did not complete the survey. If students complete either
the opinion survey or the alternative survey, they will be able to
access their end of semester grades at the earliest possible time. Those
students who chose not to participate will be locked out of retrieving
grades until a later date. SGA has recommended that we provide students
with a shorter time-span to complete the survey. During that shorter
window of opportunity, SGA officiers will help message to their peers
the importance of completing the survey. FAPC has recommended that a
statement be added to syllabi indicating the importance of the surveys.
Our students have made a compelling case (through SGA) that all courses
with 10 or more students be surveyed. This aligns with the “best
practices” found at other institutions and sends a message about the
importance of the survey. Faculty would still be able to select the
class surveys that they feel are most representative of their efforts
for evaluation purposes.