Faculty Affairs Policy Committee (FAPC) Tentative Agenda

Friday, April 2, 2010  12:30 p.m.-1:45 p.m

Kilpatrick 221 (Glass Conference Room)

 

  1. Call to Order       

  2. Approval of March 5, 2010 Minutes

  3. FAPC Annual Report

        a.    This annual report is required by University Senate bylaw

    • IV.Section 2.  The committees listed in V.Section2.A.1 shall constitute the standing committees of the University Senate.  Each standing committee and the Executive Committee shall present a comprehensive, written, annual report in an appropriate format to the Executive Committee.  This report shall include a summary of the major items considered by the committee during the academic year and the disposition of each.  The Executive Committee shall set a due date and the format of these reports in consultation with the standing committee chairs and these reports shall be posted with the minutes of the last University Senate meeting of the academic year.   

        b.    2009-2010 committee annual report website

        c.    Due Date: No later than Wed 21 Apr 2010;  2009-2010 Annual Report Template

  4. Post-Tenure Review

    1. USG Academic Affairs Handbook

    2. BoR Policy  8.3.5.4 Post-Tenure Review for Tenured Faculty and Administrators

      Each institution shall conduct post-tenure reviews of all tenured faculty members. Each faculty member is to be reviewed five (5) years after the most recent promotion or personnel action, and reviews shall continue at five-year intervals unless interrupted by a further review for promotion.

      Administrators who have tenure and who also have some teaching responsibilities will not be subject to post-tenure review as long as a majority of their duties are administrative in nature. At such time as an administrator may return full-time to the faculty, she/he will be placed into the post-tenure review cycle and will be evaluated under those guidelines as a faculty member in the fifth year following the return to the faculty and at subsequent five year intervals (BoR Minutes, August 2007).

      The institution president shall review and approve institutional post-tenure review policies, as well as any subsequent revisions. These institutional policies must conform to the institution’s mission and to USG procedures for post-tenure review. Institutional policies also shall address cases in which a tenured faculty member’s performance is deemed unsatisfactory (BoR Minutes, April 1996, p. 39-47; May 1996, p. 52; February 2007).

    3. GCSU Academic Affairs Handbook

    4. Post-Tenure Review: An AAUP Response

  5. Adjourn

Faculty Awards Document (FINAL DRAFT) as forwarded to Provost Jordan (posted on 03-05-2010 after the FAPC meeting)