Senate Evaluation Comments

May 10, 2007

 

+ = Similar or additional comment.

 

Intro

 

Great way to start and meet people ++

Excellent icebreaker +

I remember everyone’s name

Fun & engaging ++++

Valuable

Camaraderie+

 

Hard to locate someone I didn’t know

Took forever+

 

 

Passing the torch

Good way for new senators to find out what their responsibilities are++++

Participants received beneficial information, but I’m not sure how they processed it

Fit nicely into the agenda

One of the best parts++

Enjoyed the discussion summaries – need to try to get more old senators to attend

 

Goals were a bit cloudy – annual report versus tips for Senators

Maybe we could have a list of motions (passed, failed, or tabled) and list of issues brought to the senate the previous year and how they were acted upon

This could be done as a small reading assignment for new Senators

I forgot what we did

Very rushed

 

Lunch

Great spread and time to see the survey+ + +++

Best part++

Enjoyed it+++++

 

Coffee next time +

Please respond better to dietary request ie protein source

I’m not a big fan of meat and cheese

Didn’t like it that much

 

Vision

Good way to generate ideas+++++++

Will be effective if we all do our part

Easily turned into a planning session

Helpful

 

Seems to jump the gun – shouldn’t issues come to us before we map the year

Important issue, but I would have liked more time to process it

Not enough directions

 

 

Tag lines

Too cute +++

Good way to unify effort, plans, and goals++

Fun, but do you actually want to use these

Helped to build relationships

This is important

Good for buy-in as a whole

 

“Just fun” – but not in a positive way

Silly wearing thin

Could have combined with vision the prior session

Not enough time+++

 

Scenarios

Good situations – difficult to resolve

Forced us to think about how the senate works as a whole+

Helpful made us think+

Good exercise +++

Great discussions++++

Effective

 

More clear once discussions about the other scenarios occurred- our scenarios were a bit vague

 

Too much time given+

Provide scenarios on handouts – hard to read transparency

Too clear cut and obvious

 

Reflection

Meeting new fellow senators

How much I don’t know

Shared governance takes work

Always a good idea to reflect

I appreciate being able to give feedback

Necessary, but somewhat obvious

Session 4 was informative

The steering was interesting and important

I learned a lot more about Senate and com. roles

Good wrap up and summary

 

Overall

Good idea as a whole for an organizational meeting+++++++

It was more effective than last year because there was more effort to integrate com. and exercises that helped us to think about the senate as one piece.++

Great idea to share results of concept survey- I’d focus more on these and how we might address respondents’ concerns.

Great way to use Macon space.+

Arrange tables into groups –arrange room in circles.

Well worth the trip

Meeting fellow senators

I enjoyed the nice room with windows.

Helpful in creating an atmosphere for development+

Helps break the ice

Entertaining+

Better location than Rock Eagle

I loved the Senate retreat- great job with organizing and planning+

 

 

Perhaps now that the governance model has been institutionalized maybe an annual senate retreat is not necessary. One day is a big commitment of time. It may be possible to distribute the information between the spring organizational meeting and the first meeting of the fall.